![]() ![]() ” But we can set up a rule that removes these problems, and then the benefits will outweigh the „costs. It is simply not fair to the innocent person who is killed.Īuthor also added that it will create „terror and distress to the victims, the witnesses, and society generally. First, a doctor’s choice of whom to kill will be arbitrary. Harris gives two objections to killing one person to save two people. So, by not killing an innocent “donor” for the necessary heart and lungs, the doctor chooses to kill Y and Z. The medical procedures to save Y and Z are available, and in other medical treatments, a doctor’s failure to provide the service would be regarded as equivalent to killing the two patients. ![]() Y and Z ask: Why don’t we just kill a suitable donor? If a recently deceased person were a donor, Y and Z can be saved. Patient Y needs a heart and patient Z needs lugs. „The Survival Theory” shows two sick people who needs organ transplant for saving their lives. We can sacrifice one person to save people. ![]() John Harris suggested us that there could happened situations in witch the rational thing to do would be killing a healthy person and take his organs to transplants. John Harris, the Survival Lottery Short Summary ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |